Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Non-banks urge revamp of TFF criteria

Publication Date: Friday, 20 November 2020
This article originally appeared in Mortgage Professional Australia

Non-bank lenders and recently licenced ADIs are urging the Reserve Bank of Australia to launch a review of the allocation criteria for its $200 billion Term Funding Facility, according to a report by Banking Day. Non-banks argue that the TFF has tilted residential mortgage flows in favour of major banks.

Under the TFF’s rules, all APRA-licenced deposit-takers can draw down up to 5% of their loan books, Banking Day reported. That means most of the funding goes to Australia’s largest banks: ANZ, Westpac, NAB and CBA.

“There is an uneven playing field between banks and non-banks in relation to the pricing of financial support provided through the TFF,” Adam Moore, director and head of securitisation at Brighten Home Loans, told MPA. “The non-bank market makes up an increasingly significant percentage of the residential mortgage market in Australia, and to continue to encourage competition, we believe TFF support should be extended to non-banks. The current disproportionate measures risk pricing non-bank lenders out of certain product segments, which in the long run will be a low for the end borrower in terms of choice and flexibility.”

Non-bank lenders are seeking meetings with federal government ministers and Treasury officials to push for a reworking of the TFF allocation rules, Banking Day reported. Non-banks say the major banks are “weaponizing” the TFF against their businesses.

During an online conference held Tuesday by the Australian Securitisation Forum, RBA assistant governor Chris Kent defended the TFF, Banking Day reported. Kent said the amount of funding under the TFF was “modest” and only had an impact “at the margin.”

“There has always been a gap in the funding costs for ADIs and non-ADIs,” Kent said. “I don’t think the gap has opened up as a result of our actions.”

James Austin, chief financial officer of Firstmac, disagreed.

“We are confident the RBA, on reflection, would concur with our observations,” Austin told Banking Day. “The banks have used TFF funding to offer large cash-backs to consumers switching home loans, but are only offering this on fixed-rate loans where the borrower is locked in for the equivalent period of the subsidised TFF funding. These offers are not applicable to variable-rate loans and banks have not passed on any of the savings in terms if cheaper variable-rate loans.”

Austin also told Banking Day that the impact of the TFF was far from “marginal.” He said that Firstmac expected to lose one-third of its home-loan book to the major banks if the allocation criteria were not changed.

Moore agreed that the criteria needed to be changed.

“We would like the counterparty eligibility criteria to be extended to allow TFF support to be extended on a proportional basis to non-banks,” he told MPA.




我的BDM Mikai Ning从我第一次认识她到现在有两年多的时间,非常的专业、超高效,很耐心的聆听和讲解我的每一个问题,即便是在她怀孕期间也专门嘱咐我“不要紧,有问题尽管问,看到一定及时回复”。态度永远超级nice!和她沟通总是让人感到轻松和愉快!我做贷款这么多年,Mikai是我最喜欢的BDM没有之一!我要给她120分的好评

Lulu, 铂腾注册贷款经理人

对Mikai Ning超级好评,她不仅业务娴熟,而且对工作认真负责及时答复无无论是任何时间都会及时回复。节假日有问题咨询也能做到及时回复。对broker超级有耐心和负责,我们非常喜欢和支持Mikai Ning和Brighten!

Fan, 铂腾注册贷款经理人

Brighten的BDM Liwen给我留下了深刻的印象,无论是policy和product方面的扎实度,还是在贷款环节中的任何一个小问题,Liwen总是在第一时间及时给出帮助。Brighten一直给我很好的体验,好的利息和好的BDM和好的credit team,让我总是在第一时间把Brighten产品作为推介给客户的首选

Jinkai, 铂腾注册贷款经理人

Mikai 是一个积极主动,工作能力强,并且拥有良好的交际技能的人。我们和Mikai的合作十分的顺利,希望能和Brighten保持这样良好的合作关系。

Alan, 铂腾注册贷款经理人

我的BDM Leo Liu 在产品方面的介绍为我提供了很大的帮助。 我期待与Brighten和Leo Liu建立更好的合作关系。

Anthony, 铂腾注册贷款经理人

Mikai 是我们的BDM 她很负责任. 能及时的回复我们的问题 如果有policy的update 她也是尽可能的除了email 之外 电话或者message给我们. 确认我们能收到 了解这些变化. 以确认我们能更好的为客人服务. 非常感谢长期以来对我们broker的支持。

Terry, 铂腾注册贷款经理人

非常便捷,利率也比较亲民,铂腾房贷解决了海外客户贷款难题;感谢BDM Mikai 的大力支持。

Yuhui, 铂腾注册贷款经理人


Jakie, 铂腾注册贷款经理人



贷款查询,欢迎致电 13 14 88